What the proof shows
Proof can show that the payment was instructed, debited, sent through a rail, or assigned a bank reference. It does not automatically prove the supplier has usable funds.
You are in the right place if a payment confirmation is not proof of receipt. A confirmation screen may calm your internal team, but the receiving side usually needs proof it can search, match, or investigate.
Proof is useful only if it gives the receiving side enough structured information to identify the transaction. A sent confirmation is not the same as evidence that the beneficiary bank has applied the funds. For this case, gather bank confirmation, trace status, beneficiary bank status, and final credit confirmation. If the proof does not let the receiving bank locate the funds, the case has moved from proof-sharing into trace or investigation.
Proof can show that the payment was instructed, debited, sent through a rail, or assigned a bank reference. It does not automatically prove the supplier has usable funds.
A screenshot is rarely enough. Ask for bank confirmation, trace status, beneficiary bank status, and final credit confirmation, then check whether the reference can be used by the receiving bank to search for the payment.
Move from proof to trace when the supplier bank still cannot locate the funds, the payment has passed the expected window, or the status stops changing. Move to investigation when a bank has to ask another bank in the chain what happened.
Send Unicorn the proof, references, beneficiary details, and supplier correspondence. Treasury can help determine whether the next action is a bank trace, a receiving-side search, or a clearer proof pack for the supplier.